CURRENT LEGAL ARTICLES

Succession - Conveyancing - Medical Negligence - Personal Injury - Solicitors

The 2011 communication and retention of data legislation

Cybersecurity concept with lock on microchip.

  

Communications (Retention of Data) (Amendment) Bill 2022: Committee and Remaining Stages

The 2011 communication and retention of data legislation is under review and will be updated in 2022. (later this year)

 

The Minister for Justice, Helen McEntee TD, has published the General Scheme for the Communications (Retention of Data) (Amendment) Bill 2022.

The General Scheme provides that general and indiscriminate retention of communications traffic and location data can only be permitted on national security grounds, where approved by a designated judge.

In addition, the General Scheme provides for a system of preservation and production orders to facilitate the preservation of and access to specified communications data held by service providers for national security and the investigation of serious crime, where permitted by an authorising judge.

A preservation order will act as a “quick freeze”, requiring service providers to retain any specified data they hold at a particular time. 

A production order will allow access to specified data held by a service provider for commercial or other reasons. Such access is necessary for national security or law enforcement purposes.  The effect of a production order will be that a service provider must immediately take steps to produce and hand over to the relevant state agency the data described in the charge made by an authorised judge. 

Both traffic and location data will be retained for national security purposes, and subscriber data, included for national security or law enforcement purposes, will be retained for 12 months. 

The General Scheme is consistent with European Court of Justice rulings in this area. 

The Minister said:

“As I stated last month when I received Cabinet permission to draft this legislation, we mustn’t have a situation where An Garda Síochána have their hands tied behind their backs, and Gardaí must be fully equipped with solid laws and modern technology.

There should always be safeguards and protections when it comes to accessing data. Still, we must not allow the balance to shift too far away from keeping people safe and fighting crime, and the Government is taking urgent action to ensure that the appropriate legislation is in place.

With the assistance of the Attorney General and his officials, it is my intention to return to Government next week seeking approval to publish the Bill. This urgency is unavoidable given the need for legal certainty for communications service providers and state agencies on what obligations apply to the retention of communications data, which is vital for law enforcement and national security.

In addition to this urgent Bill, I intend to bring forward a more comprehensive proposal later in the year to address broader reforms and a more consolidated legal framework in this area.”

ENDS

  • The General Scheme can be accessed at the following link: www. justice.ie/en/JELR/Pages/PB22000116
  • The proposed legislation is without prejudice to the State’s current appeal, which is before the Supreme Court of a High Court ruling relating to the Communications (Retention of Data) Act 2011
  • In respect of national security, the Scheme provides that the Minister for Justice must first assess threats to the State’s safety.  Suppose the Minister deems the threat to be such as would require the retention of traffic and location data, referred to in this Bill as “Schedule 2 data”. In that case, he or she may apply to a designated judge of the High Court for an order requiring service providers to retain that data. Access to that data will require prior judicial authorisation or, in urgent circumstances, approval by a senior officer of An Garda Síochána or the Defence Forces.  Use of the urgency procedure must be notified to an authorising judge who will review whether the urgency procedure was appropriate.
  • “Preservation Orders” will require the preservation of specified electronic data in connection with specific persons, locations or other indicators (e.g. mobile phone numbers).  A Preservation Order will not in itself require the granting of access to data.
  • “Production Orders” will require the gathering and submission of specified data in a person’s possession or control to An Garda Síochána and other agencies and may include data which may already be the subject of a Preservation Order.
  • Under the General Scheme, a Preservation Order may be obtained by a Garda Síochána, the Defence Forces, the Revenue Commissioners or the Competition and Consumer Protection Commission for defined reasons were approved by an authorised judge, including the need to respond to severe offences, national security and the saving of human life.  All four agencies can access data under the 2011 Act.
  • A Production Order is a court-authorised means of accessing limited and specified data where it is required in the context of a criminal investigation.  Under the General Scheme, a Production Order may be obtained by a Garda Síochána, the Defence Forces, the Revenue Commissioners or the Competition and Consumer Protection Commission for defined reasons approved by an authorised judge.

Fundamental Rights
Private life
Protection personal data
Proportionality of data retention
Prohibition of the storage of traffic or location data
Prevention of severe crime v general indiscriminate retention data

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Elaine_O%27Hara